Online CME - Texas Children's Hospital

Forward Perspectives on Childhood Cancer to a colleague - Texas Children's Hospital

Perspectives on Childhood Cancer Advisory board - Texas Children's Hospital

Perspectives on Childhood Cancer Contact us - Texas Children's Hospital

Perspectives on Childhood Cancer home

Perspectives on Childhood Cancer home

Making a Mark, a program of art and creative writing by children touched by cancer
Texas Children's Cancer Center
Baylor College of Medicine

In this issue

Director's Corner by David Poplack, M.D.

Monoclonal Antibodies May Reduce Relapse of Acute Leukemia Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation by Robert Krance, M.D.

Current Management and Future Directions of Osteosarcoma Therapy by Lisa L. Wang, M.D.

Miles to Go: Perspectives on Medulloblastoma Management by Massimiliano De Bortoli, M.D., Murali Chintagumpala, M.D. and John Y.H. Kim, M.D., Ph.D.

Late Effects in Childhood Cancer Survivors: The New Epidemic by M. Fatih Okcu, M.D., M.P.H.

 
   
Dr. Lisa L. Wang
 

Current Management and Future Directions of Osteosarcoma Therapy
by
Lisa L. Wang, M.D.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents. It accounts for approximately 5 percent of childhood cancers. OS has a peak incidence in the second decade of life and tends to occur more frequently in boys than in girls.

Survival of patients with localized OS has improved significantly after the introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy in the 1970s, but has plateaued at approximately 65 percent. Patients with metastatic or recurrent disease continue to have a very poor prognosis. There are few predictive indicators, with the exception of the absence of overt metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, to help determine which patients will have a better clinical outcome in response to therapy. Given the lack of improvement in patient survival and the paucity of active agents against OS, the major challenges that lie ahead in the field of OS research include defining patient-based predictors or signatures of disease behavior in order to tailor therapy, and understanding the biologic aspects of OS particularly with regard to factors that influence genomic stability.

The majority of OS cases are sporadic; however, certain conditions are known to predispose to the development of OS, such as previous exposure to ionizing radiation and to alkylating agents. Cases of OS in patients older than 40 years are almost always attributable to Paget’s disease. Genetic conditions with a known predisposition to OS include hereditary retinoblastoma, Li-Fraumeni syndrome and Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. Because these genetic conditions have a known predisposition to OS, careful detailing of family history in a patient newly diagnosed with OS is important to identify underlying genetic risk and for genetic counseling of family members.

Clinical Presentation of OS
Most patients with OS present with pain in the involved area, usually of several months’ duration. Soft tissue swelling may be present, and patients may have pathologic fractures of the affected bones. Systemic symptoms such as fever, weight loss and malaise generally are absent. Laboratory evaluation is usually normal except perhaps for elevated alkaline phosphatase (in approximately 40 percent), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (in approximately 30 percent) and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. These laboratory values do not, however, correlate with extent of disease.

OS usually involves the metaphyseal region of the long bones. The most common sites of involvement in descending order are: distal femur, proximal tibia, proximal humerus, middle and proximal femur.

Approximately 20 percent of patients present with visible macrometastatic disease, most commonly to the lungs, but also to the bone. Although 80 percent do not have detectable metastatic disease, it is clear from historical studies that if these patients are treated with surgery alone, approximately 80 percent of these patients will have recurrent or metastatic disease. Thus, micrometastastic disease is present at the time of diagnosis even though disease may not be detected by radiographic methods, and systemic chemotherapy is necessary for virtually all patients in order to achieve a cure.

Diagnostic workup for suspected OS should include the following:

  • History and physical examination

  • Plain X-rays in two planes. If the tumor involves an extremity, the X-rays should encompass both proximal and distal joint regions. Generally abnormalities will be apparent on plain films. Characteristic findings include a mixed lytic and sclerotic appearance, periosteal new bone formation with lifting of the cortex and formation of Codman’s triangle, and ossification of the soft tissue in a radial or “sunburst” pattern.

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of extent of the tumor for planning of definitive surgery

  • Technetium-99 bone scan to evaluate involvement of other bones and skip lesions within the same bone

  • Chest computed tomography (CT) to look for pulmonary metastases. Visible metastases will be present in 15 percent to 20 percent of patients at initial diagnosis.

  • Definitive diagnosis of osteosarcoma is made by biopsy, preferably an open incisional biopsy, to ensure that a generous sample of adequate and representative tissue is obtained. Proper planning of the biopsy with careful consideration of the future definitive surgery is important so as not to jeopardize the subsequent treatment, particularly a limb salvage procedure.

  • The diagnosis of OS depends on histopathologic criteria with confirmatory radiologic appearance. The histologic diagnosis is based on the presence of a malignant sarcomatous stroma associated with the production of tumor osteoid and bone.

Therapy for OS
The mainstays of therapy for OS are surgery and chemotherapy. OS is relatively resistant to radiation; therefore, radiation therapy is not used as a primary treatment modality. Drugs shown to be effective and most commonly used in the treatment of OS include cisplatin, doxorubicin and high-dose methotrexate. The main features of these drugs are as follows:

  • Cisplatin is a nonclassical alkylating agent whose main toxicities include potentially irreversible renal damage, irreversible high frequency hearing loss, and reversible sensory peripheral neuropathy.

  • Doxorubicin is an anthracycline that causes myelosuppression, mucositis, nausea and vomiting. It can cause both acute and chronic cardiac toxicity that can lead to congestive heart failure. Serial monitoring of cardiac function is necessary many years after completion of therapy. Doxorubicin is a potent vessicant so care must be taken to avoid extravasation during infusion. It is also a radiation sensitizer and is usually not given during radiation therapy.

  • Dexrazoxane is a cardioprotectant agent that chelates iron, a cofactor in anthracycline free-radical reactions. It may be administered concomitantly with doxorubicin to help prevent cardiac toxicity.

  • Methotrexate is a folic acid analog that interferes with the synthesis of purines and thymidine. Its major toxicities include myelosuppression, mucositis, nephrotoxicity, and hepatic toxicity.

  • Leucovorin, a tetrahydrofolic acid derivative, is given intravenously or orally after high-dose methotrexate as a rescue agent to counteract the renal toxicity from methotrexate.

  • Cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide are alkylating agents that have also been shown to have efficacy in osteosarcoma in combination with other drugs. The major toxicities include myelosuppression, nephrotoxicity and hemorrhagic cystitis. Ifosfamide has also been associated with reversible neurotoxicity. Rarely they can cause interstitial pneumonitis. These agents are often used in conjunction with etoposide (VP-16).

  • Mesna (2-mercaptoethane sulfonate) is an agent that helps to eliminate the by-products toxic to the bladder and is given before and after infusion of chemotherapy to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis.

Definitive surgery generally occurs after several weeks of chemotherapy. The goal of definitive surgery is complete resection of the primary tumor and resection of any metastatic sites. For most extremity tumors, this is feasible and either amputation or limb salvage surgery is performed. For axial tumors (e.g., of the pelvis), complete resection may not be possible. Limb salvage involves removal of the involved tumor and bone and placement of a spacer device (either allograft, metallic implant or autograft) and prosthesis. In general, recovery from surgery takes several weeks, and chemotherapy should resume as soon as possible.

Histologic response of non-metastatic primary tumors to pre-surgical chemotherapy (determined at the time of definitive surgery) has been shown to be a predictor of disease-free survival. Patients with less than 10 percent residual viable tumor in the resection specimen have a better prognosis than those with more residual viable cells.

Outcomes
The outcome of patients with non-metastatic OS has improved dramatically over the past three to four decades from an event-free survival rate of 10 percent to 20 percent to a survival rate of 65 percent to 70 percent, mostly due to the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and improvements in surgical and diagnostic imaging techniques.

Advances in surgical techniques have also allowed improvement in the quality of life of patients with primary limb tumors through the use of limb-sparing surgical procedures to control the primary tumor.

Non-metastatic OS
 With current combinations of surgery and chemotherapy, long-term disease-free survival and overall survival rates are greater than 60 percent.

Metastatic OS
The ability to control all foci of macroscopic disease is essential in managing metastatic OS. Patients with only pulmonary disease have a survival rate on the order of 30 percent to 50 percent, whereas patients with bone metastases have a dismal prognosis. Similarly, patients with mutifocal OS have a generally worse prognosis. The overall event free survival among patients with metastatic OS remains less than 30 percent.

Recurrent OS – More than 85 percent of recurrences are in the lung, and most occur within three years of initial presentation. The therapeutic approach to recurrent disease depends on the location and timing of relapse. Patients with isolated pulmonary relapse may be long-term survivors with just surgical removal of nodules, particularly if the relapse is late (greater than one year after diagnosis) and there are a small number of nodules that do not invade the pleura and can be completely resected. In some patients multiple procedures may be necessary, although long-term survival decreases with each subsequent relapse. Patients with early relapse fare less well even with complete resection of pulmonary tumor nodules. Unresectable pulmonary or bone disease is incurable with surgery alone, and may require a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and possibly radiation therapy.

Future Directions in OS Therapy
While patients with OS have experienced improved outcomes compared to several decades ago, there have been no major improvements in therapy over the past years despite attempts to escalate pre- and post-surgical chemotherapy. Therefore, new approaches toward treatment of this unique childhood tumor need to be explored. Current research efforts at Texas Children’s Cancer Center (TCCC) are focused on defining patient-based predictors or signatures of disease behavior in order to tailor therapy, and on understanding the biologic aspects of OS particularly with regard to factors that influence genomic stability in order to identify potential therapeutic targets. By utilizing a variety of approaches, including genomic and proteomic profiling, as well as genetic models of cancer predisposition, researchers at TCCC are seeking to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of OS and the crucial factors determining metastatic potential that will provide better clinical predictors of outcome and more rational and targeted therapies.

In parallel to the laboratory efforts investigating the molecular pathogenesis of OS, investigators at TCCC have also conducted a multi-institutional collaborative treatment protocol for newly diagnosed patients with OS. This study, which includes the Pediatric Branch of the National Cancer Institute, Cook Children’s Hospital, Ft. Worth and the University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, has two main objectives. They are: 1) to improve survival by using high doses of alkylating agents with stem-cell rescue; and 2) to perform molecular profiling on tissues obtained at the times of initial diagnosis, of definitive surgery, and of recurrence. The aim is to develop molecular signatures that can accurately predict the outcome of patients at the time of initial diagnosis.

This study has already led to the identification of a chemoresistance signature and construction of a multivariate classifier that can predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the time of diagnosis prior to the initiation of any therapy. More recently another multi-gene signature has been identified that can predict the metastatic potential of OS in patients who initially present with non-metastatic disease. These signatures will be validated in a prospective manner through the upcoming joint European-North American Osteosarcoma Study (EURAMOS), which is expected to accrue a combined total of 1,400 patients in 3.5 years.

The Pediatric Program Cancer Genomics laboratory at TCCC will serve as the reference laboratory for expression profiling of all the EURAMOS samples collected in North America. These signatures will hopefully improve the risk-based stratification of OS patients so that they can receive more individualized and effective treatment at the time of initial diagnosis.

About the author
Lisa L. Wang, M.D., is a pediatric oncologist/hematologist and member of the Solid Tumor Team at Texas Children’s Cancer Center and assistant professor of pediatrics at Baylor College of Medicine. Dr. Wang's clinical interest is in osteogenic sarcoma. Her research focuses on cancer predisposition syndromes, specifically Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, a rare inherited disorder in children that predisposes affected individuals to osteosarcoma and other cancers.


Acknowledgments
Drs. Chris Man, Ching Lau, Pulivarthi Rao, Murali Chintagumpala and other researchers at Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, who are conducting the studies described in this review.

References
Gurney JG, Swensen AR, Bulterys M. Malignant bone tumors. In: Ries LA, Smith MA, Gurney JG, et al., eds. Cancer Incidence and Survival Among Children and Adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975-1995 (Pub #99-4649). SEER program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 1999:99-110.

Link MP, Gebhardt MC, Meyers PA. Osteosarcoma. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, eds. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002:1051-1089.

Ferguson, WS, Goorin, AM. Current treatment of osteosarcoma. Cancer Invest. 2001; 19:292.

Marina N, Gebhardt M, Teot L, Gorlick R. Biology and therapeutic advances for pediatric osteosarcoma. Oncologist 2004; 9:422-441.

Man TK, Chintagumpala M, Visvanathan J, et al. Expression profiles of osteosarcoma that can predict response to chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2005;65:8142-50.

Li Y, Dang TA, Shen J et al. Identification of a plasma proteomic signature to distinguish pediatric osteosarcoma from benign osteochondroma. Proteomics 2006;6:3426-35.

Wang, LL, Gannavarapu, A, Kozinetz, CA, et al. Association between osteosarcoma and deleterious mutations in the RECQL4 gene in Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95:669-674.

Back to top